The 3 Main Ways to Invest in SpaceX Pre-IPO

The 3 Main Ways to Invest in SpaceX Pre-IPO

1. Invest in Funds That Own SpaceX Shares

• Some mutual funds, ETFs, and private funds already hold SpaceX stock.
• Examples include venture-style or “interval” funds.
• These are the most accessible option for regular investors.

Downside:

• Many of these funds trade at large premiums to their actual value (NAV).
• You’re not just buying SpaceX—you’re buying a basket of assets with fees.

---

2. Buy Into Secondary Markets (Pre-IPO Share Platforms)

• Platforms like EquityZen allow investors to buy shares from employees or early investors.
• This gives more direct exposure to SpaceX equity.

Downside:

• Usually limited to accredited (wealthy) investors.
• Shares can be illiquid and hard to sell.
• SpaceX can block transactions via “right of first refusal.”

---

3. Invest Indirectly Through Related Public Companies

• Some public companies or funds have business ties or ownership stakes in SpaceX.
• Buying those stocks gives indirect exposure.

Downside:

• SpaceX may only be a small part of the company’s value, so returns won’t track it closely.

Please take into account that the majority of IPO's sell off post IPO and this will likely not make money for years if ever. If you are considering investing in this I would recommend placing it in the high risk category of your portfolio.

Big 6 Tech Stocks Suddenly Look Cheap- Exxon has a higher PE than NVDA?

 

Exxon Mobil P/E Is Now Higher Than Nvidia — What’s Going On?

2026 has been rough for Big Tech stocks, with many of the major names pulling back significantly.

Why the Drop?

It’s largely driven by massive spending on AI infrastructure (data centers, chips, etc.), which is pressuring profits in the short term.

Investors are starting to question:
When will this actually pay off?

There’s growing skepticism about whether these investments will generate near-term returns, even if the long-term story remains strong.

---

Valuations Are Coming Down

The underperformance of the technology sector is starting to create attractive valuation opportunities for investors.

As Goldman Sachs strategist Peter Oppenheimer noted:

“The underperformance of the technology sector is also starting to generate attractive valuation opportunities for investors, as its valuation—relative to expected consensus growth—has fallen below that of the global aggregate market.”

---

Meanwhile… Energy Stocks Are Rising

Because of the current oil rally driven by tensions in the Middle East, oil company P/E ratios have risen sharply—
in some cases even surpassing those of tech stocks.

That leads to a surprising headline:

Exxon Mobil P/E Is Now Higher Than Nvidia — What’s Going On?

---

A Shift in Valuation Dynamics

Price-to-earnings ratios in tech are falling to more reasonable levels.

In some cases, these stocks are now:

• Cheaper relative to their own history
• More in line with (or closer to) the broader market

---

But “Cheap” Doesn’t Mean Risk-Free

This creates a split narrative:

• An opportunity (if AI investments pay off), or
• A value trap (if returns disappoint)

How do 6 of the largest tech companies compare to each other right now?

Satellite Stocks: A Complete Guide to Investing in the Space Economy

 

Satellite Stocks: A Complete Guide to Investing in the Space Economy

The satellite industry has quietly become one of the most important pillars of the modern global economy. From GPS navigation and internet connectivity to military intelligence and climate monitoring, satellites are everywhere—and investors are starting to take notice.

As the space economy expands, a growing number of publicly traded companies are focused specifically on satellite technology. These range from operators of massive communication networks to firms building next-generation constellations in low Earth orbit (LEO).

This guide breaks down the key satellite stocks to watch, organized by sector, along with insights into how the industry is evolving.

---

Satellite Communications: The Backbone of Global Connectivity

Satellite communication companies generate revenue by providing data, voice, and broadband services across the globe—especially in areas where traditional infrastructure is limited.

Iridium Communications is one of the most established players, operating a global network of satellites that deliver reliable voice and data services worldwide.

Globalstar has gained attention through its partnership with Apple, powering emergency satellite messaging features in smartphones.

Viasat focuses on high-speed internet for aviation, military, and rural markets, while EchoStar maintains a large satellite infrastructure footprint tied to Dish Network.

Canada’s Telesat is building its next-generation Lightspeed LEO network, aiming to compete with emerging global systems.

Meanwhile, AST SpaceMobile represents one of the most speculative but exciting plays, attempting to connect standard smartphones directly to satellites.

---

Earth Observation: Turning Data Into Insight

Earth observation companies use satellite constellations to capture high-resolution imagery and data about the planet. This information is increasingly valuable for governments, agriculture, climate science, and defense.

Planet Labs operates one of the largest fleets of imaging satellites, capturing daily images of the Earth’s surface.

Satellogic focuses on high-frequency imaging, while BlackSky provides near real-time geospatial intelligence services.

These companies are often compared to SaaS businesses due to their recurring data subscription models, though profitability remains a work in progress for many.

---

Satellite Manufacturing and Infrastructure

Behind every satellite network is a complex supply chain of manufacturers and technology providers.

MDA Space is a standout in this category, known for its robotics and satellite systems, including contributions to the Canadarm.

Terran Orbital specializes in small satellite production, while Gilat Satellite Networks provides essential ground-based communication systems.

Redwire is another emerging player focused on in-space manufacturing and satellite components.

These companies are often seen as “picks and shovels” plays, benefiting from overall industry growth regardless of which satellite operators dominate.

---

Launch and Hybrid Space Companies

Some companies operate across multiple segments, including launching satellites and building spacecraft platforms.

Rocket Lab has become a leader in small satellite launches while also developing satellite components and platforms.

Astra Space aims to provide low-cost, rapid launch capabilities, though it remains highly speculative.

---

Defense Giants With Satellite Exposure

Large aerospace and defense contractors play a critical role in satellite development, particularly for government and military applications.

Lockheed Martin and Boeing both manufacture advanced satellite systems, including GPS and defense-related infrastructure.

L3Harris Technologies contributes key satellite payloads and communication technologies.

While not pure-play satellite stocks, these companies provide stability and consistent revenue compared to smaller, high-growth players.

---

Satellite ETFs: Diversified Exposure

For investors looking to gain exposure without picking individual winners, exchange-traded funds offer a broader approach.

ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF focuses on space-related innovation, including satellites.

Procure Space ETF provides more direct exposure to satellite and space infrastructure companies.

---

How to Think About Satellite Investing

Satellite stocks generally fall into four major categories:

• Connectivity: Telecom-style recurring revenue (Iridium, AST SpaceMobile)

• Data & Imaging: High-margin data businesses (Planet Labs, BlackSky)

• Infrastructure: Hardware and systems providers (MDA Space, Redwire)

• Launch: Enabling access to space (Rocket Lab)

Each segment carries different risk profiles, timelines, and capital requirements.

---

Risks and Opportunities

While the long-term growth story is compelling, many satellite companies are still in early stages and burning cash. Competition is also intensifying, especially with private giants like SpaceX dominating launch and satellite internet.

However, major tailwinds remain:

• Expansion of LEO satellite constellations

• Growth in direct-to-device connectivity

• Increasing defense and geopolitical demand

• Rising need for real-time global data

---

Final Thoughts

The satellite sector sits at the intersection of technology, defense, and telecommunications—making it one of the most dynamic areas in the market today.

For investors, the opportunity is clear: as demand for global connectivity and data continues to rise, satellite companies could become as essential as traditional telecom providers. The challenge lies in separating long-term winners from speculative hype.

If approached strategically, satellite stocks offer a unique way to invest in the future of the global economy—one orbit at a time.

The “Safe” Way to Use Martingale Trading Strategies (Almost Nobody Does This)

Read below and I guarantee I’ll change your mind about Martingale Trading Strategies. At the very least, I’ll give you some ideas to apply to your risk management in trading. I’ll also share the exact setup I’ve been using for the last 9 years, which has returned an average of 1.32% ROI per week. It doesn’t sound like a lot, but because it compounds, I’ve been doubling my account roughly every 13 months, with an average annual return of 94%.

Martingale money management and risk management systems have a bad reputation for being an extreme version of risk management. Sellers of Martingale algos love to show those smooth equity curves, but they gloss over the massive amount of risk you’re taking on when it gets pushed to its limits. Oftentimes, this results in blowing up an account.

Using a Martingale system where you simply double down after every loss, without proper risk management or understanding the tolerance of your setup, is a recipe for disaster. I can virtually guarantee you’ll blow your account unless you make your money quickly and get out.

If you haven’t taken every precaution and opportunity to learn about the market you are entering, and haven’t properly assessed the risk of your setup before entering, then you’ve crossed the line from a professional trader or investor into a gambler. That’s really the dividing line between the two.

I’ll tell you a nearly foolproof way to use Martingale right now. I say “nearly” because it all depends on your backtesting, and how good you are at it. Even the most robust backtests can break or change over time.

Step 1: Get a mechanical setup that is at least 1:1, or slightly higher (like 1.3:1), to offset fees, slippage, spreads, etc.

Step 2: Run a backtest and get the largest sample size possible—at least a few thousand trades. The bigger, the better. Try to get the highest win rate you can, but it isn’t the most important factor.

Step 3: Look at the extremes of the backtest, especially consecutive losses and wins. Plan your Martingale strategy around those extremes.

For example, if your system has a 50% win rate and shows up to 12 consecutive losses, wait until the setup has at least 5 consecutive losses before entering. In this case, you’re planning for up to 7 more losses (assuming your account can handle it). You could also flip this and bet on a loss after a streak of wins, but you’d need to reverse the risk/reward. This is similar to the high-low card counting technique, which actually works.

Step 4: Understand that markets always change, and backtests can break over time. Diversify across multiple setups. They won’t all fail at once, and ideally you’ve made enough and rotated into safer strategies before that happens. Also diversify across uncorrelated instruments and markets.

---

How I’ve Been Using It Successfully for 9 Years

First off, even though I’m saying Martingale can work, it isn’t necessarily the best approach for everyone. If you are risk-sensitive or new to trading, I would not recommend this. If you’re a professional trader with better setups that outperform this with less risk, stick with those. You may be better off using a consistent position-sizing strategy.

That said, here’s what I’ve been doing.

I’ve been using Martingale on ETFs for indices, taking long-only trades. The setup looks for bottoms using RSI oversold signals. Since you’re only going long, you’re essentially buying the dip and waiting for a rebound.

The win rate is around 60–70%, depending on the asset. It uses roughly a 1.1:1 reward-to-risk ratio. The 70% win rate comes from a backtest of over 7,000 trades on one particular index ETF, so I focused heavily on that.

You could also use leveraged ETFs, but then you need to consider the lack of dividends and volatility decay, which can erode your position over time.

Another way to manage risk is to avoid strict doubling. Instead of a 2x multiplier, you could use something like 1.5x. This lowers returns but also reduces risk, and allows you to keep more cash available to diversify or extend your drawdown tolerance (e.g., handling 6 losses instead of 5).

There has only been one period in the last 9 years where I experienced an extended drawdown. This was during the COVID crash, when prices dropped very quickly. I ended up holding the position for just over a month before it hit my take profit. I didn’t even hold long enough to collect a dividend, although sometimes you’ll accidentally capture one if you enter near an ex-dividend date.

My system was designed for 7 consecutive losses. When I hit the 8th, I held the position and continued dollar-cost averaging when new signals appeared. I wasn’t using margin, so there were no margin-related risks. Essentially, I was buying a significant dip—about 25–30% off the highs—in a strong, long-term uptrending asset.

The idea is to use dividends, if necessary, to help dollar-cost average until the price eventually hits your take profit. This way, you’re getting paid to hold.

This strategy would not work well in futures, forex, or CFDs due to holding fees and the lack of dividends. It could work in crypto since there are no holding fees, but I personally don’t trust holding crypto long-term, and again, there are no dividends.

You could also focus on high-dividend stocks (5–10% yield), ideally monthly payers, so you can DCA faster than with quarterly dividends. The key is to focus on fundamentally strong assets—blue chips, mega caps like Google or Coca-Cola, or broad index ETFs. Avoid assets in long-term downtrends, even if they pay dividends. Also avoid commodity ETFs, as they can remain in drawdowns for years.

---

Example Rules (Trading VOO Since 2018)

Using RSI (14) on a 15-minute chart with a 1.1:1 reward-to-risk:

Entry Rules:

1. RSI must go below 30 (oversold).

2. When RSI closes back above 30, enter the trade.

Stop Rules:

• Stop is based on the nearest swing low.

• I typically use the wick of the candle where RSI was below 30, but using the candle body produces similar results (test this yourself).

Take Profit Rules:

• Calculate the distance between entry and stop.

• Set take profit at 1.1x that distance (1.1:1 reward-to-risk).

---

Position Sizing (Martingale)

Because each trade has a different stop distance, you’ll need to adjust share size accordingly. And because the share price changes from trade to trade it needs to be adjusted as well.

If your broker allows fractional shares, this is easier. If not, you can start small and scale:
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, etc.

---

Conclusion

That’s it. You don’t need anything overly complicated to make money with this approach. The only real barriers are starting capital and an account.

If you have any questions, let me know in the comments or reach out on StockTwits: https://stocktwits.com/J2sun

And when you become a millionaire, let me know.

Wendy Kirkland Trading Review: I Looked Inside the Strategy So You Don’t Have To (Backtested over 100 trades)

Before you consider purchasing any of Wendy Kirkland's trading products or services, I would highly recommend that you read my review below.

I want to start by pointing out that she was barred by the SEC in 2020. Here is an excerpt from the PDF, which you can find here:

False and Misleading Representations Regarding Trade Signal Services

Kirkland stopped trading options in or around 2012 and never made millions through options trading.

“Kirkland be, and hereby is:
barred from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization; and
prohibited from serving or acting as an employee, officer, director, member of an advisory board, investment adviser, or depositor of, or principal underwriter for, a registered investment company, or an affiliated person of such investment adviser, depositor, or principal underwriter.”

My experience with her systems 

When reviewing any courses, books, setups, or software, I am extremely skeptical of sellers who refuse to provide detailed backtests or who are vague about any part of their methodology. 

I first came across Wendy Kirkland’s systems a few years ago on YouTube around 2018. I watched several of her videos, and at the time she appeared to be selling two systems. I made several attempts to contact their support and never got a response back about backtst data she offered to show for her trading but was never provided.

In any event I decide to find her trading setup and run some backtests of her trading setups myself. I watched 4 or 5 videos which gave small clues to piece it all together although they were a little confusing as she kept giving slighlty different versions of her setup. In one video she says to use the ADX with the DI and provides specific settings (see notes). In another video, however, she gives different settings and says to use the standard ADX settings without the DI.

1) CCI Sharkfin System

The first system is based on signals from the CCI indicator (which she calls the “Sharkfin” system) and focuses on identifying overbought and oversold conditions.

2) Merit Paycheck Service (P3 System)

The second is the Merit Paycheck service, which uses her P3 system. This system combines a PPO or MACD indicator with two ADX indicators and again attempts to take trades based on overbought and oversold conditions.

3)Her current system that she is pedallign is call the DNA(Direct Next Action) system. Most of her videos seem to be on the Select Market Services channel. The date of the videos on YT is in 2026 so she is still selling courses and services. I have no experience with this but it loks to be based on another new indicator. But based on all those horribly underperforming ones, and blatant mistating results IDK how you could possibly trust her at this point. Seems like just another scam.

---

My backtest Results

In her videos she states multiple times that she prefers to use both of these systems on the QQQ daily chart. She says you can use it on other stocks and time frames but mainly on this so I'll show you the real results of a backtest I just did yesterday using the exact same rules she uses on the QQQ. She never gives the exact rules for getting stopped out or taking profit so i made some assumptions and backtested various ways of doing so.

1)CCI system

2)P3 System

---

What Others Are Saying

1. Many reviews on Trustpilot where the majority are negative https://ca.trustpilot.com/review/www.tradewins.com

2. Forum posts on Stockgumshoe where the majority are negative.The hefty $1,997 price tag, combined with the poor performance reported by users, appears to be a common complaint.

3.  https://www.stockgumshoe.com/2014/01/microblog-merit-paycheck-trading-the-qqqs-from-wendy-kirkland/

5. Another forum where the respondents said the figures she gave to sell her courses were hypothetical and not real https://nexusfi.com/trading-reviews-vendors/28117-past-experience-wendy-kirkland-4.html

6. In 2020 she was indicted by the SEC. She and her two business partners were each fined $40,000 and banned from selling their investment services in the future.https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2020/34-88797.pdf

---

Where You Can Find Her

Websites

http://www.f3advisory.com/

https://www.ffrtrading.com/trader/wendy-kirkland/

https://weeklywealthadvisory.com/

https://www.tradewins.com/wendy-kirkland/my-early-retirement-income-trading-merit-qqq/

YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXbbFWZkGF4&list=PLvZ_Wj_JJMCPQ1UP-bKOiinWVbnxJIF3t

Agora Financial Review: What They Don’t Want Investors to Know

I think that of all the online trading and investing advice scammers, Agora Financial and its many subsidiaries—which seem to pop up like mushrooms every other month—have to be the worst of the worst.

They target newbies and seniors in retirement who have little to no knowledge of how to trade or invest properly. Across more than a dozen services that I’ve tracked, every single one has underperformed the market, and that doesn’t even include the fees for their subscriptions.

They have also been caught flat-out lying about potential investment ideas many times in the past. The company has been sued many times and has lost nearly every time.

Agora is sneaky, though. It isn’t always obvious that many of their companies are owned by or partnered with them.

For example:

Agora, Inc. is a U.S.-based publisher of financial newsletters such as The Oxford Club and Wall Street Daily. Meanwhile, Agora Dealer Services Corp. operates as a Canadian wealth platform for advisors, providing technology and custody services. Both use the “Agora” brand, but they serve different markets.

The U.S. group focuses on direct-to-consumer financial media, while the Canadian entity focuses on B2B wealth management services, offering investment platforms, reporting tools, and back-office support for independent advisors.

Some of the other associated publishing brands include:

• Southbank Research

• Paradigm Press

Around 2021, Agora reportedly changed its name to Monument and Cathedral Holdings, likely due to the negative press from numerous lawsuits and fines levied against it by government regulators.

They also sold off Agora Financial to a company called MarketWise, which went public in 2021. MarketWise was run by many of the same people who had been running Agora Financial. MarketWise is now publicly traded under the ticker MKTW.

After changing its name, Agora now appears to be trying to reintegrate Agora Financial by buying it back, suggesting that the various name changes and corporate restructuring may simply be part of an ongoing rebranding effort.

-----------------------------------

sources

https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilybaker-white/2025/07/07/this-secretive-company-built-an-empire-by-hawking-bad-financial-and-health-advice-on-facebook/

https://truthinadvertising.org/brands/agora/#:~:text=A%20Stipulated%20Order%20is%20entered,(formerly%20known%20as%20Agora%2C%20Inc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0Ga87FNE6U&t=3s

https://truthinadvertising.org/brands/agora/

The 5-Step Process That Took Me From Failed Day Trader to Consistent Profits

I’ve been trading off and on from 1998 to 2016. I never took it that seriously, other than my retirement account investments, which were longer term. Mostly I just invested in the S&P 500 index. It’s done well because I simply dollar-cost averaged.

In 2016, I decided to get back into day trading. The first two times I tried it, I failed badly and blew up one futures account in the process.

From 2016 to midway through 2017—about 1.5 years later—I finally found consistency. From 2017 to 2020, or a little over four years, I had an average return of 132% on my account. That means I roughly 5x’d it in four years.

I retired in 2020 when COVID hit, and I still trade full-time to this day. I’ve made more than enough money for myself and will likely stop day trading soon. That being said, I enjoy it and find it fun and challenging—almost like a money game.

Anyway, this is the bigger-picture five-step plan I would say anyone needs to follow. Even if you are a fundamentals-only, longer-term investor, you still need to verify that your thesis is sound. How are you going to do that?

The nonsense of saying “not everything is quantifiable” is often just an excuse to be lazy. Some things are harder to quantify than others, to be sure—at least right now. Or maybe it’s just an excuse to avoid facing the cold, hard truth that you don’t know as much as you thought you did and that your plan really doesn’t work.

---

Bigger Picture: 5-Step Process to Becoming a Successful Trader

Each step involves numerous smaller steps, but this will give you an overview of the process you’ll be involved in.

Keep in mind that learning about the markets never stops. It’s an ongoing process as markets change over time. You should allocate a portion of each day toward learning something new, or at least keeping up with current events. Patience is an asset here—there is no rushing this.

1. Find setups that work for your situation

Everyone trades differently. Your setups need to fit your personality, time availability, and risk tolerance.

2. Test your setups

a) Backtest first

Then move to small positions until you’ve proven the strategy works in forward testing.

• If the backtest looks good but the forward testing doesn’t fall in line, you need to address that before moving forward.

3. Scale up once the setup is verified

Once your setup has been verified with small positions, you can begin scaling up.

Every setup and instrument is different in how you approach this, so you’ll need to experiment to find the best method. It can vary from broker to broker and country to country depending on regulations and fee's.

Some of the most common ways to scale up include increasing position size, increasing leverage(using margin or a loan), leveraged etf's, or options.

4. Continuous monitoring of the setup

Your trading is based on your backtesting, so it’s critical to monitor performance.

Keep two things in mind:

1. The market is always changing.

2. The only way to maintain confidence in a system is to compare current performance with historical results.

Your backtests are your lifeline. They are everything.

You need to know the historical ranges for your setup:

• How many consecutive wins?

• How many consecutive losses?

• Typical drawdown periods?

These give you the tolerance ranges for the setup. Everything should continue normally unless one or more of those ranges are broken and something new appears. At that point, you need to reassess what’s happening and why.

5. Manage risk

This part is very simple: diversify.

Diversify across:

• Several setups

• Multiple markets

• Different market conditions

For example:

• Some setups may be trend-following.

• Others may be mean-reversion.

They will perform differently at different times, but both should be profitable over the long run.

You should also use software and tools to help you scale up—automation, EAs, or anything else that improves execution and efficiency.